Advanced Analysis of DOM-Based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS)

In this article, we delve into DOM-Based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), a vulnerability class that allows malicious scripts to be executed on a browser

DOM-Based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), a common vulnerability class within web applications, allows malicious scripts to be executed within the context of the victim's browser, giving attackers potential access to sensitive information and interaction capabilities. A comprehensive understanding of DOM-based XSS requires a deep dive into web technologies like the Document Object Model (DOM), JavaScript, and HTML.

The Document Object Model (DOM)

The Document Object Model is a programming API for HTML and XML documents. It represents the structure of a document as a tree-like model, facilitating reading and manipulation of the document's content, structure, and style. The DOM is an object-oriented representation of the web page, which can be modified with a scripting language such as JavaScript.

For example, consider this simplified HTML document:


<!DOCTYPE html>



                        <h2 id="title">Hello World</h2>




In the DOM, this document is represented as a tree, with html as the root node, branching out to the body node, and further to the h2 node. Each node in the DOM tree can be manipulated using JavaScript, enabling dynamic web applications.


Mechanism of DOM XSS

DOM-based XSS vulnerabilities arise when a web application's JavaScript code writes user-controlled data into the DOM without proper sanitization or validation. The user's web browser executes this written data as part of the JavaScript code.

A DOM-based XSS attack lifecycle involves three stages:

  • Source (Attack Injection Point): This is where the web application reads data from an input source, which could be components of the URL (e.g., fragment, parameters), document properties (cookie, referrer), or HTML storage mechanisms (localStorage, sessionStorage).
  • Sink (Attack Execution Point): The sink is where the web application writes data to a dangerous location. Dangerous sinks are generally functions or properties that can lead to script execution when they receive user-controlled input. Examples of dangerous sinks are eval(), setTimeout(), innerHTML, write(), and many more.
  • Execution (Attack Payload Execution): When the web application writes user-controlled data containing a malicious payload to a sink, the browser executes the payload.


A DOM-based XSS vulnerability can be illustrated with the following JavaScript code snippet:

let userData = document.URL.substr(document.URL.indexOf("#") + 1);


The document.URL property is the source, where the user-controlled input is read. The document.write() function is the sink, where the user-controlled input is written, potentially leading to script execution. If an attacker could control the fragment (data after '#') of the URL, they could inject a malicious script. For example,<script>alert('XSS');</script> would execute the injected script.


Dissecting DOM XSS Categories

DOM XSS can be further categorized into three types:

  • Type-0 (Local or Self): The attack and payload execution occur on the victim's machine without any interaction with the web server. An example scenario could be a Single Page Application (SPA) that includes JavaScript code to fetch data from the server using AJAX and updates the DOM accordingly.
  • Type-1 (Reflected): The payload is embedded in the URL and affects users who access this malicious URL. The payload is reflected off the web server and executed when the server's response is rendered by the browser.
  • Type-2 (Stored): This type is similar to traditional Stored XSS. The payload is permanently stored on the target server (e.g., in a database or a file) and is delivered to users when they request the stored information.


Identifying DOM XSS Vulnerabilities

Detecting DOM XSS vulnerabilities can be challenging because they occur entirely on the client-side, making server-side security measures less effective. Two techniques typically used are Static Application Security Testing (SAST) and Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST).


Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

SAST, also known as white-box testing or static code analysis, is the process of examining the application's source code for potential security vulnerabilities. For DOM XSS, this could involve identifying dangerous sinks and tracing data flow from sources to these sinks.

Consider this code snippet:

let params = new URLSearchParams(;

let name = params.get("name");

document.getElementById("welcome").innerHTML = name;


The source of data is, and the sink is document.getElementById("welcome").innerHTML. If the input from name is not sanitized before reaching the sink, it could lead to DOM XSS.


Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST)

DAST, also known as black-box testing, involves analyzing the application during its execution. The process typically involves feeding the application with test data and monitoring its output for anomalies. Tools equipped with JavaScript and DOM understanding would interpret and interact with client-side JavaScript code, following the data from sources to sinks.

How to mitigate and prevent DOM XSS vulnerabilities

Several strategies can be adopted to mitigate DOM XSS vulnerabilities:

  • Input Validation: Enforce a strict policy on what input is allowed. This can be achieved using allow-lists or regex patterns. For example, if a URL parameter should only contain alphanumeric characters, any non-alphanumeric input can be rejected or sanitized.

let params = new URLSearchParams(;

let name = params.get("name");

let pattern = /^[a-z0-9]+$/i;


if (!pattern.test(name)) {

   console.error("Invalid input");

} else {

   document.getElementById("welcome").innerText = name;



  • Output Encoding: When user-controlled data must be inserted into the HTML, encode it properly to ensure special characters are interpreted as text rather than script. JavaScript provides functions like encodeURI(), encodeURIComponent(), or you can leverage libraries such as OWASP's JavaScript Encoder for this purpose.
  • Content Security Policy (CSP): A well-defined CSP can prevent the execution of unauthorized scripts. CSP is a standard that allows you to define a whitelist of trusted sources of content such as scripts, stylesheets, and images.
  • Avoiding Dangerous JavaScript APIs: Certain JavaScript functions and properties can lead to DOM XSS if not used properly. Functions like eval(), setTimeout(), setInterval(), and properties like innerHTML and write() are considered risky because they can execute or create HTML/JavaScript. Safer alternatives like textContent, setAttribute(), or createElement() should be used when possible.

In conclusion, understanding the mechanics and dangers of DOM-based XSS vulnerabilities is critical to ensuring the security of modern web applications. Although these vulnerabilities can be challenging to detect and mitigate due to their client-side nature, a combination of well-designed programming practices and thorough testing can significantly reduce the risk they pose. The usage of advanced client-side security headers like CSP and newer, safer APIs provide further defense against DOM-based XSS.


Exploitation Techniques and Tools

An understanding of common exploitation techniques can provide additional insight into how these vulnerabilities are abused and thus, how to build stronger defensive measures.

Typically, attackers use the <script> tag to inject malicious JavaScript code. However, there are numerous other HTML tags and attributes that can lead to JavaScript execution, such as <img onerror>, <body onload>, <svg onload>, and more. This variety increases the complexity of validating user inputs and underscores the importance of proper output encoding.

Moreover, there are advanced exploitation techniques, such as leveraging javascript: pseudo-protocol in a URL or creating a data-flow path across different web technologies like CSS and HTML.


To facilitate the process of discovering DOM XSS vulnerabilities, several tools can be employed:

  • Automated Security Scanners: Tools like OWASP's ZAP and PortSwigger's Burp Suite Pro have automated scanners that can detect DOM XSS vulnerabilities. These tools use both static and dynamic analysis techniques.
  • Browser Extensions: Extensions like OWASP's DOMinator Pro can help find DOM XSS vulnerabilities while you browse a website, analyzing JavaScript code and DOM modifications in real-time.
  • JavaScript Frameworks Vulnerability Testing: Some tools are specially designed to test vulnerabilities in specific JavaScript frameworks. For example, the DOMPurify library is used to sanitize HTML and prevent XSS in applications using frameworks like Angular and React.
  • Source Code Analyzers: Tools like SonarQube and ESLint can scan the source code of an application and highlight potential security vulnerabilities, including risky usage of JavaScript functions and properties that can lead to DOM XSS.


Advanced Defenses Against DOM XSS

Preventing DOM XSS involves both server-side and client-side security measures:

  • Secure Coding Practices: At the core of preventing DOM XSS is adopting secure coding practices. This includes not just the correct usage of APIs and functions but also understanding the potential security risks of using different web technologies. For example, newer JavaScript features like Template Literals may bypass traditional XSS protections if not used correctly.
  • Web Application Firewalls (WAFs): While WAFs are typically used to block traditional XSS attacks, they can also help prevent some DOM XSS attacks, especially reflected ones. WAFs can filter out known bad inputs and block requests containing malicious payloads.
  • HTTP Security Headers: In addition to Content Security Policy, other HTTP security headers can help protect against DOM XSS. These include Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS) to enforce secure connections, X-Content-Type-Options to prevent MIME type confusion, and X-Frame-Options to prevent clickjacking.
  • Subresource Integrity (SRI): SRI is a security feature that allows browsers to verify that resources fetched from third-party servers have not been tampered with. Using SRI helps protect users against integrity breaches and can prevent the execution of tampered scripts that might lead to XSS.
  • SameSite Cookies: The SameSite attribute on cookies can help prevent attacks that rely on stealing cookies. By setting SameSite to 'Strict', the browser only sends cookies if the request originated from the same site. This prevents the attacker from using the victim's cookies even if they manage to execute script code via DOM XSS.


Expanding Knowledge with Security Resources

To stay ahead in this continually evolving field, developers should familiarize themselves with security resources such as the OWASP Foundation. The Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP) is an online community that shares articles, methodologies, documentation, tools, and technologies in the field of web application security.

Two primary OWASP resources are particularly useful for understanding and mitigating DOM-based XSS vulnerabilities:

  • OWASP Testing Guide: This guide provides a detailed procedure for identifying security issues, including DOM-based XSS.
  • OWASP Code Review Guide: It includes a section on reviewing code for DOM-based XSS vulnerabilities, providing an in-depth view of potential risks during the development process.

Understanding DOM-based XSS attacks, their implications, and prevention methods are crucial in today's web-centric world. As web applications continue to become more complex and integrated with various technologies, developers and security professionals must stay updated on the latest threats and mitigation strategies. By adopting secure coding practices, employing advanced security measures, and utilizing helpful security resources, the risk of DOM-based XSS vulnerabilities can be significantly reduced.

Similar posts