Crowdtesting vs Traditional testing which one to choose to improve CRO

Crowdtesting is the new way of testing a product to identify defects and improve CRO. This article will explain the advantages of Crowdtesting over traditional testing to increase CRO.

With the rapid evolution of software technology, delivering the best-in-class product is imperative. Therefore, the software testing processes for conversion rate optimization (CRO) also developed significantly. Though the traditional testing models are norms for many years, organizations are keen to adopt advanced testing processes, like crowdtesting.

Improving CRO is essential to retain existing customers, increase reach and convert prospects to valuable clients. And Crowdtesting is the new way to test a product for flaw identification and improve CRO. This article will walk you through the advantages of Crowdtesting over traditional QA testing to boost CRO.


CRO tests: What are the Traditional Testing Methods

Testing the quality of software or applications is always a priority for organizations. The traditional methodologies offer some benefits, but these processes bring more disadvantages in today's fast-paced industry.

There are two main legacy testing methods.

Inhouse testing:

In this method, organizations need to hire an in-house team of experts to perform the testing for CRO improvement. It is done in a phased manner and takes time to identify the defects. The sample size is comparatively small and often cannot detect all the issues. Moreover, the cost is also significantly high.

Outsourced testing:

Often, companies hire a third party to perform testing to improve CRO. You need to give control over your data and information. Additionally, you need to get involved in monitoring the progress and response the queries. In addition, the price tag is usually rather hefty.

Crowdtesting is a unique testing methodology to improve your CRO. It is fast, unbiased, and affordable, eliminating the major challenges of legacy methods.

How to Use Crowdtesting to Improve CRO:

With the help of a community of skilled humans, crowdtesting gathers feedback on the different aspects like functionality, usability, features, responsiveness, etc., of a software. Due to the diversified crowd, organizations get insights from different viewpoints.

The vetted community of testers uses the software from a real-users perspective and captures all bugs and issues. The company then collects the information, analyzes them, and gets insights to make the product more appealing and practical for the end users.

Crowdtesting vs. Traditional Testing: Why the Crowd Wins for CRO


Conventional testing requires specialized testers, which is costly for firms. Crowdtesting can cut testing expenses by paying testers per project. In crowdtesting lets testers use their own devices and facilities, saving the organization money on setting up testing infrastructure.

Greater diversity:

Crowdtesting involves a wider range of testers. Traditional testing uses a small group of testers in a controlled environment to find software defects. Crowdtesting gathers testers across the world with varying technical skills. This diversity helps identify more flaws and defects than a smaller set of standard testers might.

More accurate data:

The number of test cases in traditional QA testing is usually small and only covers a subset of the software. Crowdtesting allows for more test cases to be executed, allowing for more comprehensive coverage of potential outcomes. As a result, the software is tested more thoroughly in every possible way.

Fast and flexible:

Crowdtesting also allows for faster testing, which is a major plus. For many projects, the traditional testing procedure might take many weeks, if not months, to complete. In contrast, due to testers being able to work around the clock in various time zones, Crowdtesting allows for a faster response time.

Eliminates bias:

When performing traditional QA testing, it is not uncommon for a team of testers to have preferences regarding the software's features and capabilities. With Crowdtesting, testers come from different places across the globe and are not invested in the outcome in any way. As a result, you may rest assured that flaws or errors will be found without bias during the testing process.


Compared to typical QA testing methods for CRO, crowdtesting offers numerous benefits. They include a more diversified, rapid, inexpensive, and realistic testing process. To boost the CRO, you need to ensure that the software performs as expected under real-world conditions. Therefore, businesses should adopt the crowdtesting methodology immediately to take a competitive advantage on the CRO.

Similar posts